Streamlit Plotly_chart Warning: Understanding Kwargs Deprecation

by Alex Johnson 65 views

Ever been working on a fantastic Streamlit app, crafting beautiful visualizations with st.plotly_chart, only to be met with a slightly confusing kwargs deprecation warning? You're not alone! Many developers, even when diligently following the latest documentation and using parameters like width="content", are seeing this message pop up. It can be a bit disheartening when you feel like you're doing everything right, yet the console tells you otherwise. This article aims to demystify this particular st.plotly_chart kwargs deprecation warning, explain why it's appearing even with documented arguments, and provide some clarity on how to approach it. We'll dive into the specifics of how width="content" interacts with Streamlit's internal handling of arguments, ultimately helping you build more robust and warning-free data applications. Our goal here is to make sense of this technical hiccup in a casual and friendly tone, focusing on providing valuable insights to help you navigate the ever-evolving world of Streamlit and Plotly integration. Let's make those charts shine without any annoying warnings!

Unpacking the st.plotly_chart Deprecation Warning

The st.plotly_chart deprecation warning regarding kwargs has been a point of confusion for many Streamlit users, especially those trying to align with the latest API changes. Previously, to make a Plotly chart expand to the full width of its container in Streamlit, you would often use use_container_width=True. However, as part of Streamlit's ongoing improvements and API refinements, this parameter was deprecated. The new, recommended way to achieve similar responsive sizing is by using the width argument, specifically setting it to width="content", or by explicitly defining numeric width and height values. It seems straightforward, right? You update your code, embracing the new syntax, and expect a smooth ride. Yet, much to our surprise, using st.plotly_chart(fig, width="content") often triggers a deprecation warning that states: "Variable keyword arguments for st.plotly_chart have been deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Use the config argument instead to specify Plotly configuration options." This warning clearly refers to kwargs, which stands for "keyword arguments," implying that we are passing an unrecognized or variable keyword argument. The perplexing part is that width is a documented and intended parameter for st.plotly_chart. So, why the fuss?

Let's look at the heart of the matter. The warning originates from a specific piece of code within Streamlit, as highlighted in the issue description:

if kwargs:
    show_deprecation_warning(
        "Variable keyword arguments for st.plotly_chart have been "
        "deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Use the "
        "config argument instead to specify Plotly configuration "
        "options."
    )

This snippet is designed to catch any unexpected keyword arguments passed to st.plotly_chart and inform the user that such usage is deprecated. The intention is good: to encourage developers to use the config argument for Plotly-specific customizations that aren't direct Streamlit parameters. However, in this specific scenario, when you call st.plotly_chart(fig, width="content"), the width="content" part should be consumed by Streamlit's width parameter. The fact that it's landing in kwargs and triggering this warning suggests an internal parsing misstep or an unexpected order of operations within the st.plotly_chart function itself. It's as if Streamlit isn't recognizing width as its own parameter before bundling it into the generic kwargs dictionary. This creates a frustrating experience where users are trying to use the correct, updated API, but are still being penalized with a deprecation notice. The reproducible code example provided perfectly illustrates this:

import plotly.graph_objects as go
import streamlit as st

fig = go.Figure()
fig.add_trace(go.Barpolar(r=[1], theta=[0], width=[120]))
fig.update_layout(width=500, height=360) # Note: Plotly figure layout width/height

st.plotly_chart(fig, width="content") # Streamlit specific width

In this example, width="content" is passed directly to st.plotly_chart. If you run this with Streamlit versions like 1.50.0 (as reported), you'll likely see the deprecation warning. This clearly indicates that width="content", despite being a valid parameter, is causing the kwargs check to incorrectly flag it. Understanding this nuance is crucial for any developer aiming for a clean and efficient Streamlit application. It's a regression from previous versions where use_container_width worked without such warnings, and the new width parameter should ideally behave similarly without unintended side effects.

Why is This Happening? A Look Under the Hood

When a Streamlit plotly_chart issue like this crops up, it often points to how arguments are processed internally. The core of this problem lies in kwargs handling within the st.plotly_chart function signature. Typically, Python functions that accept arbitrary keyword arguments (**kwargs) process their explicitly defined parameters first. Any remaining keyword arguments that don't match an explicit parameter are then collected into the kwargs dictionary. For st.plotly_chart, the width parameter was introduced to replace use_container_width. The expectation is that when you call st.plotly_chart(figure, width="content"), the width argument is recognized and consumed by Streamlit's dedicated width parameter. However, the current behavior indicates that width="content" is not being correctly consumed as an explicit parameter. Instead, it seems to be getting bundled into the kwargs dictionary, which then triggers the generic deprecation warning. This is a classic case where the implementation of a new feature (the width parameter) might not be perfectly integrated with the existing warning mechanism for variable keyword arguments. It suggests that the if kwargs: check is executed after or without fully accounting for width as an internal, Streamlit-specific parameter.

This scenario highlights an interesting interaction between Streamlit's desire to evolve its API (by deprecating use_container_width and introducing width) and its efforts to clean up how Plotly-specific config options are passed (by deprecating arbitrary kwargs and promoting the config dictionary). The width parameter is unique because it's a Streamlit-level display control, distinct from Plotly's internal layout configurations, which should go into the config argument. The width parameter is specifically designed to control how the Plotly chart renders within the Streamlit layout. Its improper handling as a kwargs not only generates an unnecessary warning but also creates confusion for developers who are trying to adhere to best practices. The impact of this behavior is significant: it creates noise in the console, making it harder for developers to spot actual misuse of deprecated features. It can also erode confidence in the API, as seemingly correct usage leads to warnings. For new users, it's particularly frustrating, as they might spend valuable time debugging a warning that isn't their fault, or mistakenly believe they are using the API incorrectly. It hinders the smooth migration process for existing applications that need to adapt to the new width parameter. Quality content in development often means a clear, predictable API, and warnings should ideally guide users to correct their code, not to question the library itself. The issue tracker on Streamlit's GitHub is indeed the right place to report such regressions, as the community relies on consistent and reliable behavior. This isn't just about silencing a warning; it's about ensuring the API behaves as documented and expected, fostering a more pleasant development experience.

How to Navigate and Potentially Mitigate the Warning (for now)

While the st.plotly_chart warning concerning kwargs with the width="content" parameter is fundamentally a bug in Streamlit's warning mechanism, developers often need immediate solutions to keep their applications clean and free of console clutter. Unfortunately, a perfect fixing plotly_chart warning workaround that allows width="content" to be used without triggering the kwargs deprecation warning and without modifying Streamlit's source code doesn't exist at the time of this writing, as the issue stems from an internal parsing logic. However, there are some Streamlit workarounds you can consider, depending on your priorities.

One approach, if the warning is genuinely distracting, is to avoid passing width="content" directly to st.plotly_chart for now. Instead, you can control the width directly within the Plotly figure itself, using fig.update_layout(width=...) or fig.update_layout(autosize=True). While autosize=True in Plotly aims to make the chart responsive, it doesn't always achieve the exact same "container width" effect as Streamlit's width="content". If you need a specific pixel width, setting it in fig.update_layout will work, but you lose the automatic container width adjustment. For example:

import plotly.graph_objects as go
import streamlit as st

fig = go.Figure()
fig.add_trace(go.Barpolar(r=[1], theta=[0], width=[120]))
# Set the width directly in Plotly's layout
fig.update_layout(width=700, height=450) # Example fixed width/height

st.plotly_chart(fig) # No width argument passed to st.plotly_chart

This method effectively bypasses the problematic width="content" parameter in st.plotly_chart, thereby avoiding the kwargs warning. However, it's important to remember that this isn't a fix for the underlying bug but rather a way to circumvent it. You might not get the dynamic resizing behavior you desire with width="content".

Another related consideration is the config argument. The deprecation warning explicitly states: "Use the config argument instead to specify Plotly configuration options." This is the correct way to pass any Plotly-specific settings that aren't directly exposed as st.plotly_chart parameters. For instance, if you want to disable the Plotly modebar or change how zooms work, you'd use the config dictionary.

st.plotly_chart(fig, config={'displayModeBar': False})

This approach is entirely separate from the width issue, but it's crucial to understand for proper Plotly configuration in Streamlit. The current bug is precisely that width, which should be a Streamlit parameter, is being treated as an arbitrary kwargs instead of a config option.

Ultimately, for those who prioritize using width="content" for its intended responsive behavior, the current mitigation often involves tolerating the warning and awaiting a Streamlit patch. It's vital to keep your Streamlit library updated, as these issues are typically resolved in subsequent releases. Checking the official Streamlit GitHub repository for updates on this specific issue (or similar ones) can also provide insights into when a fix might be expected. Providing high-quality content in your application means not just visually appealing charts, but also code that runs smoothly and without unexpected warnings, even if the current situation is a temporary library hiccup.

The Future of Streamlit and Plotly Integration

The ongoing refinement of Streamlit and Plotly integration is a testament to the platform's commitment to providing an exceptional experience for data scientists and developers. Deprecations, while sometimes a temporary inconvenience like the kwargs warning we've discussed, are usually a sign of progress. They represent an effort by the Streamlit team to introduce more coherent, robust, and user-friendly APIs. The transition from use_container_width to the more versatile width parameter is a prime example of this evolution, aiming for better control over chart rendering and a more predictable layout experience across different devices and screen sizes. This focus on API consistency is paramount for a framework that strives for simplicity and power. When an API is consistent, developers can learn patterns that apply broadly, reducing the cognitive load and accelerating development. It means that whether you're embedding a Plotly chart, a Matplotlib chart, or a simple data table, the fundamental principles of how you control its size and appearance within Streamlit should ideally be similar. This consistency helps in creating high-quality content for users, as the underlying framework behaves reliably.

Moreover, the drive to clarify kwargs handling by pushing Plotly-specific configurations into the config argument is a strategic move to separate concerns. Streamlit aims to be a high-level wrapper, and by providing a dedicated config parameter, it gives developers direct access to Plotly's extensive customization options without cluttering Streamlit's own parameter list or requiring Streamlit to "understand" every possible Plotly configuration. This clear separation makes the API easier to maintain, easier to document, and ultimately easier for users to understand where to put what. The bug where width="content" gets misinterpreted as a kwargs is a momentary setback, but it doesn't detract from the larger vision of a streamlined and powerful data visualization toolkit within Streamlit. The open-source nature of Streamlit means that issues like this are often quickly identified and addressed by a responsive development team and an active community. Developers are encouraged to participate by raising clear issues, providing reproducible examples, and even contributing to discussions or proposed fixes. This collaborative approach ensures that the platform continues to grow and improve, making data science accessible and enjoyable for everyone. As Streamlit evolves, we can expect even tighter integration with popular libraries like Plotly, offering more intuitive controls and fewer unexpected hiccups. The goal is always to reduce the friction between idea and deployed application, allowing users to focus on their data and insights rather than battling with library quirks. Staying engaged with the Streamlit community and keeping your installations updated are the best ways to leverage these continuous improvements.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the st.plotly_chart kwargs deprecation warning that appears when using the width="content" parameter is a perplexing issue that many Streamlit developers have encountered. We've explored how this warning, intended for arbitrary keyword arguments, mistakenly flags width="content" due to what appears to be an internal parsing oversight. While there isn't a direct code-based workaround to completely silence this specific warning while still using width="content" as intended at the time of this writing, understanding why it happens is the first step towards managing it. Remember, this isn't a sign that you're using the new width parameter incorrectly, but rather a temporary glitch in Streamlit's warning system. We emphasize the importance of using the config argument for actual Plotly configurations, maintaining API consistency, and contributing to the community by reporting such regressions. Keeping your Streamlit library updated is always the best strategy, as issues like this are often quickly resolved. By focusing on creating high-quality content and providing value through informed development practices, we can continue to build amazing interactive data applications.

For further information and to stay updated, we highly recommend checking out these trusted resources: